If someone think I merged gen stack with like 2 units which were close to Ankara. That person is so "smart".
Of course I first moved my most important group, gen stack from Athens, strigh into my cap. Avoiding to put them into random cities and mix with another units. Later I sent other units. And in some of my lastes moves, these two famous units.
Why when I attack Lviv I don't take walled London, next turn. Game mechanic are broken and need to be fixed, who using and abusing bugs, deserve some kind of punishment.
If someone knew how to make tb chances 100% if in normal state they are like 20% that's abuse. I also doesn't want that anyone jumping on my walled cities.
Person who got baned for doing that, making jokes about that here.
It's much better when some players menage to win on fair and clear way.
We had that case with cold case in our last cw. Total opposition then in cw before, when dirty moves happened.
CC had situation where he could def multiple countries or make big risky rush.
I had situation to decide should i attack or def. First I wanted to att but changed my mind. Looked at my teammates and decided to play more careful. I did mistake.
Oxis as Ukraine had his own dilemma. Will CC full strike or he's going to def some of his lands... Maybe 30 pd units can hold 50 units imp rush, maybe he wont attack at all, maybe I need to add another 30 units and etc. We did wrong choices, CC picked best one he had. He won, on fair way and nothing except to say "gg" didn't left for us.
Cw vs brutal is sad story for us, for some it's full of happiness. He had 100 units, our player 400, when cw ended. He won on sp or on rewall. He could've won even without rw. We would say gg again if he played with respect. Now we calm he won thanks to walls abusing.
Players which are decent in reading where's ur opponent going to strike and enough range skilled, doesn't need xbug on the line. So he tell them how to win using broken mechanics.