|
Escrito por Sun Tsu, 09.06.2016 at 14:58
Escrito por Guest, 09.06.2016 at 10:57
First of all I'd like to state that I've never heard of an incident where admins Ivan and Amok had reduced someone's rank upon request, the only time I saw this was whenever someone SP farmed which is an obvious reason to. I'm pretty sure this is a recent thing that Sun Tzu did and is pretty stupid -
Hormigatomica is the first account that springs to mind
I don't think he ever had his sp lowered..well, he might of, idk lol it shows he's a rank 11 but i remember him being rank 9 so I'm confused
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Well.. Hormigaatomica is not here. But this is his stance on this matter about farm.
Yes, it´s farming cause you are taking advantage from your experience dueling lower ranks.
This definition of farm is pretty interesting.
Why do u think it´s interesting?
There are 2 odds of farming in duels:
- one of them, being a high rank and dueling low ranks directly.
- and the second one is making alts accounts being a high rank and dueling low ranks, you are taking advantage of your experience, cause you are not really a rank 4 or 5, you are only in upgrades, but you are a high rank hidden in an alt account who know lot ot tips, tricks, moves, etc etc etc...
That´s farming too.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
I don't know much about dueling but why not have elo brackets based on your overall elo at the beginning of the season. Something like 1000-1100 bronze bracket 1101-1250 silver bracket and 1251-9999+ gold bracket. Top 3 players in each bracket get a medal, after each season whatever your elo is at, at the end is what bracket you compete in next season.
----
We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Escrito por Helly, 10.06.2016 at 03:33
I don't know much about dueling but why not have elo brackets based on your overall elo at the beginning of the season. Something like 1000-1100 bronze bracket 1101-1250 silver bracket and 1251-9999+ gold bracket. Top 3 players in each bracket get a medal, after each season whatever your elo is at, at the end is what bracket you compete in next season.
Nice... gona fuck up my elo to 1000 so i can compete in a noob bracket next season and i want my trophy to say "top noob"
----
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Biggest issue for me... is season ending clock.
Its like, everybooody knooows season is ending in 7 hours, 13 minutes and 34 seconds and suddenly everyone starts to duel (farm. grind)
4 hours until season ends and im at 3. place, which i have been for the basically entire season, but 2 hours later im literally watching at work how pontez who wasnt even top 5 the whole season is suddenly doing duel after duel after duel grinding, grinding
And then im cursing America and season ending on their time and im like searching Al qaeda sites to try to make a donation and shit like that...
Regulate the season ending for fuck sake, limit the number of duels one can do in the last week at least
----
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
I don't think he ever had his sp lowered..well, he might of, idk lol it shows he's a rank 11 but i remember him being rank 9 so I'm confused
Yeah, he did, for a couple weeks at least.
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Escrito por Helly, 10.06.2016 at 03:33
I don't know much about dueling but why not have elo brackets based on your overall elo at the beginning of the season. Something like 1000-1100 bronze bracket 1101-1250 silver bracket and 1251-9999+ gold bracket. Top 3 players in each bracket get a medal, after each season whatever your elo is at, at the end is what bracket you compete in next season.
This sounds too much like LoL. I'm not sure I like the elo climbing idea and Goblin is right on his comment
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Escrito por Goblin, 10.06.2016 at 04:34
Biggest issue for me... is season ending clock.
Its like, everybooody knooows season is ending in 7 hours, 13 minutes and 34 seconds and suddenly everyone starts to duel (farm. grind)
4 hours until season ends and im at 3. place, which i have been for the basically entire season, but 2 hours later im literally watching at work how pontez who wasnt even top 5 the whole season is suddenly doing duel after duel after duel grinding, grinding
And then im cursing America and season ending on their time and im like searching Al qaeda sites to try to make a donation and shit like that...
Regulate the season ending for fuck sake, limit the number of duels one can do in the last week at least
First of all, (I'm a big fan of your comments )
Going down to business, maybe we should keep in secret the last day of the season because I'm not sure it is possible to restrict the number of duels played.
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
I'm not too sure about hiding the season end. In fact, other games actually duplicate the points earned just to encourage competition in the last days, because they're the days in which the players does their 101% in order to get in the scoreboard.
Nonetheless I understand the problem with players joining the competition in the last month or week and winning a prize, this is just because with the current system the positions are easy to achieve / changes. I for example scored a very high seasonal ELO that stayed for months but still got pressured by Opi whom just came to join the ladder few days ago.
The adrenaline from the last days of the season should not be removed. I'd support any other proposal that without affecting the last days prevents dark-horses from reaching the top.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
Stryko Cuenta eliminada |
Escrito por Sun Tsu, 09.06.2016 at 14:58
Escrito por Guest, 09.06.2016 at 10:57
First of all I'd like to state that I've never heard of an incident where admins Ivan and Amok had reduced someone's rank upon request, the only time I saw this was whenever someone SP farmed which is an obvious reason to. I'm pretty sure this is a recent thing that Sun Tzu did and is pretty stupid -
Hormigatomica is the first account that springs to mind
Ah yes, and is it the only account that springs to mind? He's still rank 11 so I'm not really sure there but there must be a reason why you cut out the rest of what I wrote. Don't take this as a personal attack Sun Tzu, but I think we can both agree that reducing your rank and keeping your upgrades wasn't how this game was planned.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
Stryko Cuenta eliminada |
Escrito por Goblin, 10.06.2016 at 10:20
because they're the days in which the players does their 101% in order to get in the scoreboard.
The adrenaline from the last days of the season should not be removed. I'd support any other proposal that without affecting the last days prevents dark-horses from reaching the top.
Not all of us can stay up all night grinding on the last few hours... because the other son of a bitch has nowhere to go in the morning
Edit: simplest suggestion... limit the number of seasonaly rated duels
Edit2: work out the details... whatever
I'm not sure on how many duels everyone plays in a season but maybe something like 100 duels minimum (can be changed) in order to qualify for the leaderboard; then there should probably be a "not qualified" tab for the duel season section so it's not boring at the start of the season.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
njab Cuenta eliminada |
Escrito por Goblin, 10.06.2016 at 13:27
I already explained that it's not possible to such a farmer reach top 3 positions. Matthew and Flamma were tryharders, but Matthew is banned, starting duels in game isn't allowed anymore and it looks like Flamma gave up (he's an alt too).
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Escrito por Guest, 11.06.2016 at 01:32
I already explained that it's not possible to such a farmer reach top 3 positions. Matthew and Flamma were tryharders, but Matthew is banned, starting duels in game isn't allowed anymore and it looks like Flamma gave up (he's an alt too).
Are we gonna wait with our arms crossed until this happens?
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
Stryko Cuenta eliminada |
Escrito por Goblin, 10.06.2016 at 13:27
This is not really what i meant... my idea was basically limiting the number of your games that get rated to lower grinding and farming succes
Edit: ok i got it... after certain amount of agreed duel wins... thats your seasonal elo. So fighting and wining vs equal or better oponents is more fruitful
Thoughts... issues?
I can only think of two issues with this, 1 is that people might start refusing to duel someone else. 2nd is that you could just grind at the start of the season to get the wins and stop dueling (kinda like the old old CW systems when only first 10 games were counted)
I think we can improve on this basis with my original idea though, so after >100< duel wins you qualify, and you can keep improving your elo. (that number can be changed if it needs to be)
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Since there has been some talk about players SP being intentionally reduced without proper cause, I'm going to go ahead and fill you guys in on the situation at hand.
Moderators only lower players SP when there is foul play at hand. We do not take request from players to intentionally have their SP removed. This has been our policy for a long time and is unlikely to change.
The recent issue came about because Sun Tzu started lowering player SP upon their request. You can't really blame him as our policy on the matter was decided a long time ago and was never really listed anywhere. I've gone ahead and restored affected players(those I could find) to their original SP state. I can assure you that such incident won't happen again, as I'll make a post about this in the moderator forum as soon as possible.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
Stryko Cuenta eliminada |
Escrito por Goblin, 11.06.2016 at 07:07
Escrito por Guest, 11.06.2016 at 07:02
I can only think of two issues with this, 1 is that people might start refusing to duel someone else. 2nd is that you could just grind at the start of the season to get the wins and stop dueling (kinda like the old old CW systems when only first 10 games were counted)
Edit: bla i dont think we understand each other... you propose to me an idea that doesnt help with an issue i have with the season
But w/e ...im not playing this crap grind fest with shits fucking me up in the last second ever again... while they refused to duel me
I think I was a little unclear on my proposal, my problem with a limit is that you should be able to play as many duels as you want and keep playing after a certain qualifying goal is met, so that you can still duel and get 2 elo but also have people better/equal trying to lower your elo in which you get that 15 elo.
Let's say everyone just duels people with around the same elo or higher, what will happen to those with lower elo? They could simply be refused to duel them because "they're not worth it", especially if people are closing in on the certain limit goal (say 100). Or there comes a situation where people might not duel a particular person if they're at 90 wins and pose a threat to their chances of winning the season.
If duel wins are hard to achieve maybe like 200 duel games to qualify or w/e people will agree on, so that even if someone joins in the last month, they probably deserve it.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
njab Cuenta eliminada |
Escrito por Meester, 11.06.2016 at 07:11
Nothing can tell you how much I love you right now.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
Ghost Cuenta eliminada |
Escrito por Meester, 11.06.2016 at 07:11
I can assure you that such incident won't happen again, as I'll make a post about this in the moderator forum as soon as possible.
ok thnx for this
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Escrito por Meester, 11.06.2016 at 07:11
Thanks Meester, you are quite right I wasn't aware of previous discussions concerning SP reductions, and thank you for correcting the affected accounts. In hindsight I can see how it could be considered unfair by portraying inaccurate information in relation to a players ability.
----
intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Incognito duels are the way forward, special room, map and funds matched auto duel no backouts, will stop selective dueling
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
Stryko Cuenta eliminada |
Escrito por b0nker2, 11.06.2016 at 17:53
Incognito duels are the way forward, special room, map and funds matched auto duel no backouts, will stop selective dueling
The only reason I wouldn't want Incognito duels is I want my enemy to know what they're up against, how flexible/predictable each is and all the mind games ofc, but I like the auto duel idea.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Escrito por b0nker2, 11.06.2016 at 17:53
Incognito duels are the way forward, special room, map and funds matched auto duel no backouts, will stop selective dueling
Smart idea
----
Cargando...
Cargando...
|