Non-Retarded Scenarios are dead. R.I.P 2012-2015

Non-Retarded Scenarios are dead. R.I.P 2012-2015

Its impossible to fill anything that is not a dumb-down ww1 or a RP.

Don't believe me? Host a non-political/Non-RP scenario that requires 20 people and then post a ss here.

---

-Post Discussion Data- -Edited-

A Data sample of 1000 hosted games was taken
out of those 1000 games, only 287 had custom maps
out of those 287 custom maps, only 167 were scenarios
out of those 167 scenarios, only 123 were non-political
out of those 123 non-political scenario, only 54 are not ww1
out of those 54 non-ww1 scenarios, only 28 are not ww2
out of those 28 non-ww2 scenarios, only 18 are non-private

Here are the 18 [Custom Map, Scenario, Non-Political, Not ww1, Not ww2, Not Private]


Pyrrhic Wars
Pyrrhic Wars
Pyrrhic Wars
Pyrrhic Wars
Pyrrhic Wars
Pyrrhic Wars
Pyrrhic Wars
Legacy of Rome 9: 1453
Legacy of Rome 9: 1453
Ultimate Civil War
The Death of Rome
The Death of Rome
The Death of Rome
Siege Of Minas Tirith
Israel Vs Palestine
Robert's Rebellion by Clayy
The War of the Ring
Napoleon War

The ones in Bold are made by Aetius and Pyrrhus, the ones in italics and crossed out are made by me.

---

Escrito por Tundy, 28.07.2015 at 13:05

Non-Retarded Scenarios are dead. R.I.P 2012-2015

Its impossible to fill anything that is not a dumb-down ww1 or a RP.

Sure, I'll prove you wro....

Escrito por Tundy, 28.07.2015 at 13:05

Don't believe me? Host a non-political/Non-RP scenario that requires 20 people and then post a ss here.

wtf this is bs not even in my times a good scenario could'be filled up with 20 players. Even the WW2 of Tik had problems finding the players due to leavers/banners.

Escrito por clovis1122, 28.07.2015 at 13:14

Sure, I'll prove you wro....

Unlike other posters before me, i am not saying that afterwind is dying, but instead i am saying that it has transformed into something that i like less than its original state.

Escrito por clovis1122, 28.07.2015 at 13:14

wtf this is bs not even in my times a good scenario could'be filled up with 20 players. Even the WW2 of Tik had problems finding the players due to leavers/banners.

Tik-Tok's ww2 use to have up to 19 player slots, and GGG use to have 20.
The player slots only started being taken out when the player-base for those maps decreased.
Banning people was never a negative factor when it come to filling games.

It died when tik tok deleted his awesome WWII map

Escrito por Htin, 28.07.2015 at 13:56

It died when tik tok deleted his awesome WWII map

Stop.
Tik-Tok never deleted his map, nobody deleted his map.

Pavle's WWII filled up with 19 players.

Escrito por clovis1122, 28.07.2015 at 14:45

Pavle's WWII filled up with 19 players.

I don't know what is more funny, the fact that you have to lie about the number of players, or that you quoted me without knowing what the sentence actually meant.

Escrito por Tundy, 28.07.2015 at 15:00

Escrito por clovis1122, 28.07.2015 at 14:45

Pavle's WWII filled up with 19 players.

I don't know what is more funny, the fact that you have to lie about the number of players, or that you quoted me without knowing what the sentence actually meant.

no 19,18.


I agree,i tried many times to play my scenario but never filled bla,but i saw there was 3 RPS IN SAME TIME AND ALL 3 FILLED BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Escrito por Tundy, 28.07.2015 at 13:05

scenario that requires 20 people

Found your problem!

Escrito por notserral, 28.07.2015 at 16:19

Escrito por Tundy, 28.07.2015 at 13:05

scenario that requires 20 people

Found your problem!

even if you change the number down to 15, it won't fill unless is political or ww1.

If the mods and admins only killed RP before it got popular, but

>cant do it

Tunder only happens when it's raining.....

I tried to join a game the other day and was just kicked before anything even happened. I didn't even select a country. In my opinion your going to have a hard time filling up a game with that type of activity in the community. I virtually don't ever even try to play rp anymore.

Atieus (spelling) WW1 is pretty popular..

Summary of thread:

> Tunder unhappy his scenarios aren't getting played
> sees others are
> *RIP Tunder*

Escrito por Sultan of Swing, 29.07.2015 at 07:24

Atieus (spelling) WW1 is pretty popular..

Have you played it before? its the equivalent of RP.
it only takes 11 players of mediocre skill.

Escrito por Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 07:32

Escrito por Sultan of Swing, 29.07.2015 at 07:24

Atieus (spelling) WW1 is pretty popular..

Have you played it before? its the equivalent of RP.
it only takes 11 players of mediocre skill.

yes.. and no

im noob in scenarios and it failed cuz i was an awful austria hungary xD

Escrito por clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 08:04

Escrito por Sultan of Swing, 29.07.2015 at 07:25

Summary of thread:

> Tunder unhappy his scenarios aren't getting played
> sees others are
> *RIP Tunder*

Is this the only thing that you have? instead of proving me wrong, you resort to cheap tactics.

Escrito por Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 08:21

Is this the only thing that you have? instead of proving me wrong, you resort to cheap tactics.

Well if the WW1 we played few time ago doesn't proves you wrong... then nothing will

Escrito por clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 08:31

Escrito por Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 08:21

Is this the only thing that you have? instead of proving me wrong, you resort to cheap tactics.

Well if the WW1 we played few time ago doesn't proves you wrong... then nothing will

Escrito por Tundy, 28.07.2015 at 13:05

Its impossible to fill anything that is not a dumb-down ww1 or a RP.

Do you not read the main post before you start commenting useless crap?

Escrito por clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 08:34

Escrito por Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 08:33

Escrito por clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 08:31

Escrito por Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 08:21

Is this the only thing that you have? instead of proving me wrong, you resort to cheap tactics.

Well if the WW1 we played few time ago doesn't proves you wrong... then nothing will

Escrito por Tundy, 28.07.2015 at 13:05

Its impossible to fill anything that is not a dumb-down ww1 or a RP.

Do you not read the main post before you start commenting useless crap?

Escrito por Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 07:32

Escrito por Sultan of Swing, 29.07.2015 at 07:24

Atieus (spelling) WW1 is pretty popular..

Have you played it before? its the equivalent of RP.
it only takes 11 players of mediocre skill.

Did you not read your own argument? XD

learn to quote please, am of much confused

Escrito por Sultan of Swing, 29.07.2015 at 08:53

am of much confused

Clovis thinks that the 2 quotes below contradict and make my argument invalid.

Escrito por Tundy, 28.07.2015 at 13:05

Its impossible to fill anything that is not a dumb-down ww1 or a RP.

Escrito por Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 07:32

Have you played ww1 before? its the equivalent of RP.
it only takes 11 players of mediocre skill.

I provided data that shows the current state of scenarios, what has clovis provided besides fallacies?

What can we expect from a community composed of braindead jellyfish for the most part. The scenarios they play will match their intelligence.

Anyway - This Friday me and Tunder will organize a WW2. You are all invited. Look for Tunder's post, he will set the time we meet. Have fun.

Unleashed.

I think you forgot this third quote:

Escrito por clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 08:31

Escrito por Tundy, 29.07.2015 at 08:21

Is this the only thing that you have? instead of proving me wrong, you resort to cheap tactics.

Well if the WW1 we played few time ago doesn't proves you wrong... then nothing will

But sure, WW1 takes no skill, so you got raped as Prussia in that WW1 even though Prussia have advantage against Russia... Your two general got tricked into belarus and lithuania, you've even lost Poland twice to me (LOL! Prussia losing Poland!). One of them was in turn 8. Sure, all those walls requires no skills. You must be thinking that Russia can make walls by moving troops from A to B, simply as that.

If that game doesn't convince you that WW1 requires skill, then as I said, nothing will. Good luck.

Escrito por clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 10:26

-

Yes clovis you beat me in 1 game, that totally means that ww1 takes skill.

---

Besides, ww1 taking skill or not is not part of the argument:

"Its impossible to fill anything that is not a dumb-down ww1 or a RP."
I have provided you with data that supports my claim.

Escrito por clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 10:45

Trying to escape... Nice.

You are free to have your own opinion, but in the view of normal and sane people, ww1 takes no skill.
ww1 taking skill or not is not relevant to the main point of the topic.
now, you either provide data that shows how there is way more scenarios being played than ww1 and political, or you should remain silent.

Escrito por clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 11:02

Oh I've just see you edited the thread and posted screenshot of my lose. You've also cherry picked the data on your own to show that only RA players plays WW1. By those screenshots I assume you're implying that trenches doesn't requires skills. Sure, now show us an image of Middle east, Or Greek mediterranean, or Balkans, or even more easy, provide us an screenshot of Russia.

I don't have to prove that ww1 takes no skill, its my opinion and most people agree, opinions can't be wrong.
now you may try to convince us to agree with your opinion, but for that you need to provide real arguments instead of biased emotional responses.

Escrito por clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 11:02

> 1 game. No I am talking about the gameplay. All those walls that Russia need to make for stop Prussians requires skill. Else Prussia would win the game before revolution. If you want to lose fast, then simply don't wall / make few walls. The funny fact is that this doesn't apply for 1 game, but to all games. A gameplay is what should'be considered and based on before measuring the skill required in one spot.

Muh Skill

Escrito por clovis1122, 29.07.2015 at 11:02

Fun fact: After stating WW1 and RP, Tunder want to include WW2.

Take a look at the number of initial players