|
Infantry get -2 attack instead of 3, tanks get -2 defence instead of 3, take out +10 cost of infantry and tank, and change the militia by deleting the -1 defence for militia and return it to -0 defence for miltia meaning no change to militia defence and have it to the original state. . ps i was playing hw , and my enemy used 6 bomber and kill all my 8 Hw tanks and lost only one bomber.
----
Hi
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Uhhh that seems like a whole lot of buffing...
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Removing the +10 cost debuff and -1 defense for militia sounds good.
I feel, though, that the -3 Infantry Attack and Tank Defense debuffs are the very core of hybrid warfare, and oppose any changes there.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Removing the +10 cost debuff and -1 defense for militia sounds good.
I feel, though, that the -3 Infantry Attack and Tank Defense debuffs are the very core of hybrid warfare, and oppose any changes there.
you have unlocked hw ?
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
you have unlocked hw ?
Erm... no?!?
Haha... ha... ha...
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Maybe its better to just give inf +2 def and 1 range and tanks +2 att and 1 range give milita +2 range and lower the cost for marines and subs more
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
you have unlocked hw ?
Erm... no?!?
Haha... ha... ha...
how the hell did you try to says that a bad idea if you haven't even try HW, it's horrendous.yyou get -2attack/defence for bombers and stealth bombers
----
Hi
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
#SUPPORT I want HW to be good after all it is the most expensive strat and it is horrible! This is good post!
----
R.I.P. Mortal Kombat 2/15/2015
~Cryptic(CDN)
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Fairly sure hw is not designed to be competitive, this many buffs would actually make it good/great (idk, havnt unlocked it). As most expensive strat (SP-wise) its supposed to be more of a "i can use it... but why would I?" than a "its actually good".
Cargando...
Cargando...
|