Ouch Publicaciones: 72 De: USA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc04c/dc04c9093072cf36700b6d13a3e366132e43a104" alt="" |
It is a good idea to the fact that submarines dont have a great capacity currently anyways...
----
-Man on a Mission
AkA berserk
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
Homero Publicaciones: 78 De: Polonia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c356/6c356397752a3fc439a0f7e7ca6ab84b18c893a5" alt="" |
I would leave subs capacity where it is. They can transport 4 with MoS which I feel it's all right already.
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
Homero Publicaciones: 78 De: Polonia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c356/6c356397752a3fc439a0f7e7ca6ab84b18c893a5" alt="" |
Well maybe because AT primary role is to transport. Subs main role is surprise attack (in theory). Transport option is somehow a bonus like for helicopters in DS, and I know that in practice subs are just stealth transports rarely used for attacks but that doesn't mean they should be underwater transport for 4-5 units with 7 or 9 attack and stealth. If we go with capacity II why not make them benefit from Safer Transportation's +3 HP?
Cargando...
Cargando...
|
|
Its ok how it is 5 is just no needed
Cargando...
Cargando...
|